https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of offending portions from the High Court's judgment that questioned the credibility and bonafides of human rights activists assisting riot victims. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial decorum, restraint, and avoiding disparaging remarks. It stressed the need for judicial restraint and set right errors without besmirching reputations. The decision only applied to the appellants and did not affect other claims. The impugned observations were expunged, treating them as if they never existed. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 17:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of offending portions from the High Court's judgment that questioned the credibility and bonafides of human rights activists assisting riot victims. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial decorum, restraint, and avoiding disparaging remarks. It stressed the need for judicial restraint and set right errors without besmirching reputations. The decision only applied to the appellants and did not affect other claims. The impugned observations were expunged, treating them as if they never existed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280352