https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280349 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing disparaging remarks made by a High Court Judge against two appellants, doctors at a hospital, in a murder case. The Court emphasized the lack of opportunity for the appellants to defend themselves, criticized the remarks as unjustified by evidence, and rebuked the Judge for intemperate language. The Court stressed the need for judicial restraint and temperate language. Additionally, it noted that the High Court's direction to proceed against the appellants was improper, as the inquiry was meant for other individuals. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 16:40:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280349 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing disparaging remarks made by a High Court Judge against two appellants, doctors at a hospital, in a murder case. The Court emphasized the lack of opportunity for the appellants to defend themselves, criticized the remarks as unjustified by evidence, and rebuked the Judge for intemperate language. The Court stressed the need for judicial restraint and temperate language. Additionally, it noted that the High Court's direction to proceed against the appellants was improper, as the inquiry was meant for other individuals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280349