https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280344 A party seeking to place on record and prove a photocopy of an alleged letter by summoning municipal records was denied relief because the application was moved nearly eight years after the suit without any satisfactory explanation. The document was only a photocopy, with no stamp, signature, or receipt endorsement to support authenticity, and it therefore did not inspire confidence. A photocopy of a copy was treated as inadmissible under the Evidence Act, and where the original document could not be proved in evidence, there was no purpose in taking it on record. The application was accordingly held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 15:27:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280344 A party seeking to place on record and prove a photocopy of an alleged letter by summoning municipal records was denied relief because the application was moved nearly eight years after the suit without any satisfactory explanation. The document was only a photocopy, with no stamp, signature, or receipt endorsement to support authenticity, and it therefore did not inspire confidence. A photocopy of a copy was treated as inadmissible under the Evidence Act, and where the original document could not be proved in evidence, there was no purpose in taking it on record. The application was accordingly held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280344