https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280339 Material showing mass copying, question paper leakage and ineffective supervision justified cancellation of the examination to protect the integrity of the academic process. The reports relied on by the Board indicated copying inside the examination hall before distribution of the papers, possession of books and copying material, and failure by supervisory staff to prevent the malpractice. Even if the Naib Tehsildar lacked formal authorisation to visit the centre, that did not undermine the substance of the evidence supporting the Board's action. In such sensitive examination matters, courts should ordinarily not interfere with the academic authority's decision where the cancellation is based on material establishing malpractice. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 14:44:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280339 Material showing mass copying, question paper leakage and ineffective supervision justified cancellation of the examination to protect the integrity of the academic process. The reports relied on by the Board indicated copying inside the examination hall before distribution of the papers, possession of books and copying material, and failure by supervisory staff to prevent the malpractice. Even if the Naib Tehsildar lacked formal authorisation to visit the centre, that did not undermine the substance of the evidence supporting the Board's action. In such sensitive examination matters, courts should ordinarily not interfere with the academic authority's decision where the cancellation is based on material establishing malpractice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280339