https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280338 The Supreme Court upheld municipal provisions requiring carcasses to be deposited for removal and sanitary disposal, treating the scheme as a measure directly aimed at abating nuisance and protecting public health. It held that extinguishing the owner's title and restricting private sale did not infringe the right to property under Article 19(1)(f), because the law imposed reasonable restrictions in the interests of the general public. It further held that any incidental effect on trade did not make the restriction on business unreasonable under Article 19(1)(g). The absence of compensation did not invalidate the law under Article 31(2), as the provisions fell within the constitutional protection for public-health legislation. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 14:36:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280338 The Supreme Court upheld municipal provisions requiring carcasses to be deposited for removal and sanitary disposal, treating the scheme as a measure directly aimed at abating nuisance and protecting public health. It held that extinguishing the owner's title and restricting private sale did not infringe the right to property under Article 19(1)(f), because the law imposed reasonable restrictions in the interests of the general public. It further held that any incidental effect on trade did not make the restriction on business unreasonable under Article 19(1)(g). The absence of compensation did not invalidate the law under Article 31(2), as the provisions fell within the constitutional protection for public-health legislation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280338