<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280328</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. The penalty was imposed due to the inaccurate claim for deduction under section 80IB, which was deemed not bonafide. Despite being advised by a Chartered Accountant, the claim was found to be false, resulting in the affirmation of the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 12:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280328</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. The penalty was imposed due to the inaccurate claim for deduction under section 80IB, which was deemed not bonafide. Despite being advised by a Chartered Accountant, the claim was found to be false, resulting in the affirmation of the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>