<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 74 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, engaging in purchasing and selling space on vessels, acted as a principal, not a service provider. Profit from trading activities, buying and selling goods at different prices, was not taxable under service tax laws. Service tax could only apply to the value of taxable services rendered, not profits from trading. The order demanding service tax on vessel space trading profits was unsustainable and set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 74 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, engaging in purchasing and selling space on vessels, acted as a principal, not a service provider. Profit from trading activities, buying and selling goods at different prices, was not taxable under service tax laws. Service tax could only apply to the value of taxable services rendered, not profits from trading. The order demanding service tax on vessel space trading profits was unsustainable and set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>