https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379341 The tribunal, consisting of Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Members, dismissed the application seeking rectification of mistake in the Final Order. The tribunal held that the appellant's challenge to the classification of the activity as not falling under works contract service was not in accordance with the legal provisions. It emphasized that the application appeared to be an attempt to reargue the entire case on its merits, which was not permissible under the relevant statutory provisions. Consequently, the tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions and dismissed the application. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 09:45:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379341 The tribunal, consisting of Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Members, dismissed the application seeking rectification of mistake in the Final Order. The tribunal held that the appellant's challenge to the classification of the activity as not falling under works contract service was not in accordance with the legal provisions. It emphasized that the application appeared to be an attempt to reargue the entire case on its merits, which was not permissible under the relevant statutory provisions. Consequently, the tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions and dismissed the application. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379341