https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379340 The Tribunal acknowledged typographical errors in the Final Order related to classification contestation and details of man hours and cost in a service contract. After review, corrections were made to accurately reflect the Appellant's contestation and clarify the determination of service character under cost-plus models. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of precision and clarity in legal documents. The applications for rectification were disposed of with corrected statements issued for relevant paragraphs in the Final Order. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 09:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379340 The Tribunal acknowledged typographical errors in the Final Order related to classification contestation and details of man hours and cost in a service contract. After review, corrections were made to accurately reflect the Appellant's contestation and clarify the determination of service character under cost-plus models. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of precision and clarity in legal documents. The applications for rectification were disposed of with corrected statements issued for relevant paragraphs in the Final Order. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379340