<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 64 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379336</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad rectified factual errors in the Final Order related to CENVAT Credit and Education Cess. The Tribunal found no fault in the delegation of adjudication power by the Commissioner to lower authorities, as the Revenue did not challenge the allowed CENVAT Credit in the appeal grounds. Consequently, the application for rectification of mistake was disposed of without any error being found in the delegation of adjudication power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 09:44:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 64 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379336</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad rectified factual errors in the Final Order related to CENVAT Credit and Education Cess. The Tribunal found no fault in the delegation of adjudication power by the Commissioner to lower authorities, as the Revenue did not challenge the allowed CENVAT Credit in the appeal grounds. Consequently, the application for rectification of mistake was disposed of without any error being found in the delegation of adjudication power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>