<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 60 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379332</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax attributable to the material component of a works contract was held admissible because the documentary record, including bills, invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, supported the valuation adopted and the material portion was found deductible under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The bar of unjust enrichment was not established because the books of account and certificate showed the amount as receivable and not passed on to customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 09:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 60 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379332</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax attributable to the material component of a works contract was held admissible because the documentary record, including bills, invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, supported the valuation adopted and the material portion was found deductible under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The bar of unjust enrichment was not established because the books of account and certificate showed the amount as receivable and not passed on to customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>