<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 55 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake related to the imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Act and the applicability of Section 8 in the case. The Tribunal found no apparent error requiring rectification and noted that the application essentially sought reconsideration of the order on its merits, beyond the scope of rectification. The Tribunal emphasized that the application aimed to have the Tribunal revisit the order, leading to the dismissal of the application on 28/02/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 09:43:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 55 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake related to the imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Act and the applicability of Section 8 in the case. The Tribunal found no apparent error requiring rectification and noted that the application essentially sought reconsideration of the order on its merits, beyond the scope of rectification. The Tribunal emphasized that the application aimed to have the Tribunal revisit the order, leading to the dismissal of the application on 28/02/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>