https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379325 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT credit on the transfer of the BPO division. The Tribunal held that the transfer was valid under Rule 10 of CCR, 2004 and the merger agreement approved by the High Courts, and the appellant had correctly availed the CENVAT credit for the input services used. The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379325 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT credit on the transfer of the BPO division. The Tribunal held that the transfer was valid under Rule 10 of CCR, 2004 and the merger agreement approved by the High Courts, and the appellant had correctly availed the CENVAT credit for the input services used. The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379325