https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379324 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. It found no evidence of fraud or intent to evade duty in the appellant's wrongful availment of CENVAT credit against various services. The rest of the order was upheld, acknowledging rule violations but lacking proof of intentional evasion. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2019 18:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379324 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. It found no evidence of fraud or intent to evade duty in the appellant's wrongful availment of CENVAT credit against various services. The rest of the order was upheld, acknowledging rule violations but lacking proof of intentional evasion. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379324