<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2008-2009 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the grounds for penalty initiation in the show cause notice. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of procedural compliance and invalidated the penalty, highlighting the importance of clearly outlining the reasons for penalty initiation to ensure fair and lawful proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 06:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2008-2009 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the grounds for penalty initiation in the show cause notice. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of procedural compliance and invalidated the penalty, highlighting the importance of clearly outlining the reasons for penalty initiation to ensure fair and lawful proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>