<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 11 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379283</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s accounting method acceptable, as evidenced by regular books of accounts on a mercantile basis. The additions made by the AO were deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of disallowances for accounting charges and donations, as well as the correction of the contract payment discrepancy. The order was pronounced on 14.03.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 11 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379283</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s accounting method acceptable, as evidenced by regular books of accounts on a mercantile basis. The additions made by the AO were deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of disallowances for accounting charges and donations, as well as the correction of the contract payment discrepancy. The order was pronounced on 14.03.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>