<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 10 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving various issues, including the deletion of additions on account of advances written off, delay in provident fund payments, investigation expenses, and discrepancies in TDS certificates. The Tribunal considered circumstantial evidence, the nature of the business, and legal precedents in its comprehensive analysis, leading to a fair resolution of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 10 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving various issues, including the deletion of additions on account of advances written off, delay in provident fund payments, investigation expenses, and discrepancies in TDS certificates. The Tribunal considered circumstantial evidence, the nature of the business, and legal precedents in its comprehensive analysis, leading to a fair resolution of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>