<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17904</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the assessee was not entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for a factory land and building collectively owned by partners. The Court upheld the decision denying the exemption, emphasizing that it could be granted to the firm as a whole, not to individual partners collectively owning the property. The judgment favored the Revenue and dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:23:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17904</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the assessee was not entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act for a factory land and building collectively owned by partners. The Court upheld the decision denying the exemption, emphasizing that it could be granted to the firm as a whole, not to individual partners collectively owning the property. The judgment favored the Revenue and dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>