<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17903</link>
    <description>The High Court analyzed whether the payment of Rs. 5 lakhs to IPCO Trading Company was for business purposes. The Court found that the payment was indeed for business, emphasizing its nonrefundable nature and independence from sales transactions. Regarding the consultancy fee paid to a director, the Court referred to a previous case involving the same company and concluded that it fell within the Income-tax Act provisions. The judgment was in favor of the assessee, directing the opinion to the Tribunal without costs, with both judges concurring.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17903</link>
      <description>The High Court analyzed whether the payment of Rs. 5 lakhs to IPCO Trading Company was for business purposes. The Court found that the payment was indeed for business, emphasizing its nonrefundable nature and independence from sales transactions. Regarding the consultancy fee paid to a director, the Court referred to a previous case involving the same company and concluded that it fell within the Income-tax Act provisions. The judgment was in favor of the assessee, directing the opinion to the Tribunal without costs, with both judges concurring.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>