<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1708 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379264</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was treated as not maintainable under the litigation policy because the disputed duty fell below the prescribed monetary limit. Applying the Government circulars governing filing of appeals, CESTAT Kolkata declined further adjudication and dismissed the appeal on that ground. The stay petition was disposed of consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1708 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379264</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was treated as not maintainable under the litigation policy because the disputed duty fell below the prescribed monetary limit. Applying the Government circulars governing filing of appeals, CESTAT Kolkata declined further adjudication and dismissed the appeal on that ground. The stay petition was disposed of consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>