<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1702 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Provisional Release Orders but adjusted the Bank Guarantee amounts. It found the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty exemption and tariff values valid, ordering a bond based on tariff value and a Bank guarantee for 20% of applicable duties. The Tribunal considered the goods&#039; perishable nature, ongoing investigations, and past duty clearance instances under the same notification, leading to a re-calculation of the bond amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1702 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Provisional Release Orders but adjusted the Bank Guarantee amounts. It found the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty exemption and tariff values valid, ordering a bond based on tariff value and a Bank guarantee for 20% of applicable duties. The Tribunal considered the goods&#039; perishable nature, ongoing investigations, and past duty clearance instances under the same notification, leading to a re-calculation of the bond amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>