<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 109 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17895</link>
    <description>DELHI HC upheld the validity of notices under s.148 and s.143(2) of the Income-tax Act (and corresponding Wealth-tax notices), holding amended s.147 applicable to the years in question and rejecting reading additional words into the statute. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment was not a pretence and could be entertained on the materials, so issuance of the notices was not vitiated. The HC also held that an intimation under s.143(1)(a)(i) does not oust the AO&#039;s jurisdiction to issue a fresh s.143(2) notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 109 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17895</link>
      <description>DELHI HC upheld the validity of notices under s.148 and s.143(2) of the Income-tax Act (and corresponding Wealth-tax notices), holding amended s.147 applicable to the years in question and rejecting reading additional words into the statute. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment was not a pretence and could be entertained on the materials, so issuance of the notices was not vitiated. The HC also held that an intimation under s.143(1)(a)(i) does not oust the AO&#039;s jurisdiction to issue a fresh s.143(2) notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>