<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 85 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17894</link>
    <description>The court quashed the assessment order and notice under section 148 for the assessment year 1988-89, ruling them unauthorized and illegal. The court found the grounds for reassessment insufficient and criticized the improper rectification order as a basis for reassessment. It highlighted procedural irregularities, including finalizing the assessment before the scheduled hearing, denying the petitioner a fair opportunity. The court deemed the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct inappropriate and lacking procedural adherence, leading to the intervention under article 226 of the Constitution of India and allowing the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:11:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 85 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17894</link>
      <description>The court quashed the assessment order and notice under section 148 for the assessment year 1988-89, ruling them unauthorized and illegal. The court found the grounds for reassessment insufficient and criticized the improper rectification order as a basis for reassessment. It highlighted procedural irregularities, including finalizing the assessment before the scheduled hearing, denying the petitioner a fair opportunity. The court deemed the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct inappropriate and lacking procedural adherence, leading to the intervention under article 226 of the Constitution of India and allowing the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>