https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379244 The Tribunal held that the appellant's failure to file prior intimation before availing the benefit of Notification No. 32/2007 did not constitute a serious violation of service tax law. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the appellant's appeal was allowed based on the precedent that compliance with the notification did not necessitate prior permission but only informing the department. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:46:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379244 The Tribunal held that the appellant's failure to file prior intimation before availing the benefit of Notification No. 32/2007 did not constitute a serious violation of service tax law. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the appellant's appeal was allowed based on the precedent that compliance with the notification did not necessitate prior permission but only informing the department. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379244