https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379243 The Tribunal held that the demand for Service Tax liability on discounts received by the appellant from newspapers was incorrectly classified under Advertising agency services instead of Business Auxiliary Services. The extended period of limitation was deemed legally unsustainable as the appellant had sought clarification from the department before registration. Discounts/incentives received were considered non-taxable under Advertising agency services as they were incentives for business provided to print media. The Order in Appeal was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on these findings. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379243 The Tribunal held that the demand for Service Tax liability on discounts received by the appellant from newspapers was incorrectly classified under Advertising agency services instead of Business Auxiliary Services. The extended period of limitation was deemed legally unsustainable as the appellant had sought clarification from the department before registration. Discounts/incentives received were considered non-taxable under Advertising agency services as they were incentives for business provided to print media. The Order in Appeal was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on these findings. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379243