<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty and remanding the matter for determining the duty liability for the normal period. The decision provided detailed reasoning for each issue raised in the case, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty and remanding the matter for determining the duty liability for the normal period. The decision provided detailed reasoning for each issue raised in the case, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>