<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Retrospective Application of Rule 11UA for Share Valuation u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46191</link>
    <description>Valuation of shares - addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - share allotted prior to insertion of provision of section 56 (2)(viib) and the prescribed method of rule 11U and 11UA was notified - it would implausible to hold that the Valuation report of the independent Valuer is not correct, since method adopted by him is not in accordance with 11UA</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:03:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Retrospective Application of Rule 11UA for Share Valuation u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46191</link>
      <description>Valuation of shares - addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - share allotted prior to insertion of provision of section 56 (2)(viib) and the prescribed method of rule 11U and 11UA was notified - it would implausible to hold that the Valuation report of the independent Valuer is not correct, since method adopted by him is not in accordance with 11UA</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:03:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>