<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1645 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the financial assistance received under the 2004 Scheme should not be included in the transaction value for excise duty payment. Relying on precedents dealing with similar schemes, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding recovery of short-paid central excise duty and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1645 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the financial assistance received under the 2004 Scheme should not be included in the transaction value for excise duty payment. Relying on precedents dealing with similar schemes, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding recovery of short-paid central excise duty and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>