<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379199</link>
    <description>The court allowed the rectification of errors in the Final Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The errors identified in the order were corrected based on submissions made by the appellant and the agreement of the Authorized Representative. The rectification process ensured that the correct positions of the facts were accurately reflected in the Final Order, in compliance with the provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 07:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379199</link>
      <description>The court allowed the rectification of errors in the Final Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The errors identified in the order were corrected based on submissions made by the appellant and the agreement of the Authorized Representative. The rectification process ensured that the correct positions of the facts were accurately reflected in the Final Order, in compliance with the provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>