<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1631 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379187</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage, the court may sift materials only to see whether the complaint and supporting statements disclose a prima facie case; it cannot conduct a mini-trial. Applying that standard, the Supreme Court held that allegations against a surveyor who had submitted an adverse insurance report did not disclose the essential ingredients of intentional insult or criminal intimidation. Mere abuse, a claimed attempt to assault, and the timing of the complaint, without the requisite statutory intent or likelihood of alarm or breach of peace, were insufficient under Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The criminal proceedings were therefore unsustainable and discharge ought to have been allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:11:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1631 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379187</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage, the court may sift materials only to see whether the complaint and supporting statements disclose a prima facie case; it cannot conduct a mini-trial. Applying that standard, the Supreme Court held that allegations against a surveyor who had submitted an adverse insurance report did not disclose the essential ingredients of intentional insult or criminal intimidation. Mere abuse, a claimed attempt to assault, and the timing of the complaint, without the requisite statutory intent or likelihood of alarm or breach of peace, were insufficient under Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The criminal proceedings were therefore unsustainable and discharge ought to have been allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>