<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>gst on services etc</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114924</link>
    <description>A Gujarat seller&#039;s customer in Tamil Nadu obtained repair by a Tamil Nadu dealer who billed the seller. One view treats the repair as an intra state supply between dealer and customer, requiring CGST and SGST and limiting credit for the out of state seller. The alternate view treats the seller as de facto recipient with the dealer acting on its behalf, invoking IGST treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:28:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>gst on services etc</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114924</link>
      <description>A Gujarat seller&#039;s customer in Tamil Nadu obtained repair by a Tamil Nadu dealer who billed the seller. One view treats the repair as an intra state supply between dealer and customer, requiring CGST and SGST and limiting credit for the out of state seller. The alternate view treats the seller as de facto recipient with the dealer acting on its behalf, invoking IGST treatment.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:28:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>