<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280288</link>
    <description>Pendency of a criminal case does not automatically justify staying a civil suit arising from the same facts. A stay may be ordered only where continuation of the civil proceedings would cause real embarrassment to the accused or otherwise be unjust on the specific circumstances; the mere possibility of conflicting findings is not enough. The effect of one proceeding on another depends on the nature of the judgment and the statutory conditions governing relevance and conclusiveness. Applying that principle, the stay of the civil suit was not sustained and the civil proceedings were directed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:22:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280288</link>
      <description>Pendency of a criminal case does not automatically justify staying a civil suit arising from the same facts. A stay may be ordered only where continuation of the civil proceedings would cause real embarrassment to the accused or otherwise be unjust on the specific circumstances; the mere possibility of conflicting findings is not enough. The effect of one proceeding on another depends on the nature of the judgment and the statutory conditions governing relevance and conclusiveness. Applying that principle, the stay of the civil suit was not sustained and the civil proceedings were directed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>