<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 925 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280283</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged various disallowances including provision for trade guarantees, disallowance on account of hypothesis, expenditure on payments to clubs, bad debts, liquidated damages, and deduction claimed u/s 80HHC. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee citing previous decisions and lack of distinguishing facts. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and that of the Revenue was dismissed on April 10, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 925 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280283</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged various disallowances including provision for trade guarantees, disallowance on account of hypothesis, expenditure on payments to clubs, bad debts, liquidated damages, and deduction claimed u/s 80HHC. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee citing previous decisions and lack of distinguishing facts. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and that of the Revenue was dismissed on April 10, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>