<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1617 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, justifying the deletion of the addition made under section 41(1) regarding sundry creditors, and deleting the addition towards deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) due to the absence of shareholding. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 06:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1617 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, justifying the deletion of the addition made under section 41(1) regarding sundry creditors, and deleting the addition towards deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) due to the absence of shareholding. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>