<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on all grounds. It held that the revision order under Section 263 was invalid as the Assessing Officer had taken a permissible view. The deduction for provision for leave encashment was allowed, contrary to the CIT&#039;s direction. Additionally, the deduction for foreign taxes paid in Spain was permitted, and these taxes should not be added back while computing book profit under Section 115JB. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 15/04/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 06:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1611 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on all grounds. It held that the revision order under Section 263 was invalid as the Assessing Officer had taken a permissible view. The deduction for provision for leave encashment was allowed, contrary to the CIT&#039;s direction. Additionally, the deduction for foreign taxes paid in Spain was permitted, and these taxes should not be added back while computing book profit under Section 115JB. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 15/04/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>