<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1586 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379142</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge to clause (g) of section 2(23) of the Gujarat VAT Act, 2003 questioned whether the State provision travelled beyond Article 366(29A). In view of a similar petition already admitted for another assessment year, the Court found the matter fit for rule and granted interim protection. Coercive recovery under the impugned assessment order was therefore restrained pending determination of the validity challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 06:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1586 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379142</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge to clause (g) of section 2(23) of the Gujarat VAT Act, 2003 questioned whether the State provision travelled beyond Article 366(29A). In view of a similar petition already admitted for another assessment year, the Court found the matter fit for rule and granted interim protection. Coercive recovery under the impugned assessment order was therefore restrained pending determination of the validity challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>