https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17870 A writ petition under Article 226 was held premature where no order had yet been passed on Form No. 37-I under Rule 48L in relation to a transfer covered by Section 269UC of the Income-tax Act. The Court treated the challenge as based only on an apprehension of an adverse order and declined to examine the parties' dispute over the underlying agreement at that stage. Proceeding on the basis that the appropriate authority would act in accordance with law, the Court found no present basis to invoke writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition as not maintainable. en-us Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:05:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17870 A writ petition under Article 226 was held premature where no order had yet been passed on Form No. 37-I under Rule 48L in relation to a transfer covered by Section 269UC of the Income-tax Act. The Court treated the challenge as based only on an apprehension of an adverse order and declined to examine the parties' dispute over the underlying agreement at that stage. Proceeding on the basis that the appropriate authority would act in accordance with law, the Court found no present basis to invoke writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition as not maintainable. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17870