<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379123</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order under Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The parties agreed that the petitioner could retain the vehicle by providing a Bank Guarantee for the value of the goods. Failure to comply would result in seizure and detention of the vehicle with police and RTO assistance. The court acknowledged the agreement and concluded the case based on the understanding between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379123</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order under Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The parties agreed that the petitioner could retain the vehicle by providing a Bank Guarantee for the value of the goods. Failure to comply would result in seizure and detention of the vehicle with police and RTO assistance. The court acknowledged the agreement and concluded the case based on the understanding between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>