https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379118 The judgment confirmed the service tax against the appellant under Business Auxiliary Services due to multi-level marketing activities. The longer period of limitation was invoked but was held to be barred for confirming service tax demands related to contentious taxability issues. The Tribunal decisions were crucial in determining the limitation period's applicability, ultimately setting aside the penalty and remanding part of the matter for quantification within the limitation period. en-us Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:08:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379118 The judgment confirmed the service tax against the appellant under Business Auxiliary Services due to multi-level marketing activities. The longer period of limitation was invoked but was held to be barred for confirming service tax demands related to contentious taxability issues. The Tribunal decisions were crucial in determining the limitation period's applicability, ultimately setting aside the penalty and remanding part of the matter for quantification within the limitation period. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379118