<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal restricted the demand for service tax to the normal period under Section 73 for a Mandi Samiti renting shops and outlets, ruling out penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The extended time proviso was deemed unjustified, and penalties were set aside due to circumstances surrounding non-payment of service tax. The matter was remanded for re-adjudication, based on legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:07:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal restricted the demand for service tax to the normal period under Section 73 for a Mandi Samiti renting shops and outlets, ruling out penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The extended time proviso was deemed unjustified, and penalties were set aside due to circumstances surrounding non-payment of service tax. The matter was remanded for re-adjudication, based on legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>