<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379113</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity for the new order to be supported by reasons to adhere to principles of natural justice. The judgment underscored the importance of a thorough analysis of whether the disputed products qualified as inputs under the relevant provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1557 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379113</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity for the new order to be supported by reasons to adhere to principles of natural justice. The judgment underscored the importance of a thorough analysis of whether the disputed products qualified as inputs under the relevant provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>