<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1416 - TELANGANA &amp; ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280277</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the Revenue on both issues raised regarding commission payments made to agents through banking channels in India. It was determined that without a contract between a foreign bank and an Indian bank, the latter cannot be considered an agent, leading to a dismissal of the appeal. The court also found that entries in the books of accounts do not imply control or disposal of amounts by non-resident agents, resulting in a ruling against the Revenue on this matter as well. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and any pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1416 - TELANGANA &amp; ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280277</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the Revenue on both issues raised regarding commission payments made to agents through banking channels in India. It was determined that without a contract between a foreign bank and an Indian bank, the latter cannot be considered an agent, leading to a dismissal of the appeal. The court also found that entries in the books of accounts do not imply control or disposal of amounts by non-resident agents, resulting in a ruling against the Revenue on this matter as well. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and any pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>