<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280268</link>
    <description>A conveyance seized for transporting narcotic drugs was held not fit for interim custody under the Code where the NDPS Act&#039;s confiscation scheme applied. The Court reasoned that the NDPS Act is a special enactment to curb drug trafficking, and its confiscation mechanism, including Section 63, would be undermined if general interim custody powers were used to return the vehicle. The owner&#039;s claim that the vehicle was used without her knowledge raised factual questions requiring inquiry and did not justify release at the interim stage. As the vehicle was already secured in a garage, apprehended deterioration did not support return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280268</link>
      <description>A conveyance seized for transporting narcotic drugs was held not fit for interim custody under the Code where the NDPS Act&#039;s confiscation scheme applied. The Court reasoned that the NDPS Act is a special enactment to curb drug trafficking, and its confiscation mechanism, including Section 63, would be undermined if general interim custody powers were used to return the vehicle. The owner&#039;s claim that the vehicle was used without her knowledge raised factual questions requiring inquiry and did not justify release at the interim stage. As the vehicle was already secured in a garage, apprehended deterioration did not support return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>