<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 70 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17864</link>
    <description>The High Court of GAUHATI ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) for expenses related to maintaining a warehouse outside India. The Court reframed the question to focus on the real controversy and emphasized that questions should align with the Tribunal&#039;s order without introducing new issues. This decision underscores the significance of accurately framing questions in line with the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 70 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17864</link>
      <description>The High Court of GAUHATI ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) for expenses related to maintaining a warehouse outside India. The Court reframed the question to focus on the real controversy and emphasized that questions should align with the Tribunal&#039;s order without introducing new issues. This decision underscores the significance of accurately framing questions in line with the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>