<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1535 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and upheld the Order-in-Appeal dated 22/12/2014, emphasizing the burden of proof on the department in cases of clandestine removal. The Tribunal required concrete, affirmative evidence to substantiate such serious allegations, highlighting the need for absolute proof beyond doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1535 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and upheld the Order-in-Appeal dated 22/12/2014, emphasizing the burden of proof on the department in cases of clandestine removal. The Tribunal required concrete, affirmative evidence to substantiate such serious allegations, highlighting the need for absolute proof beyond doubt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>