<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1528 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D for taking unsecured loans in cash from relatives, as it was deemed not to violate section 269SS. Precedents where penalties were revoked in similar cases involving loans between relatives supported this decision, ensuring a consistent legal interpretation in such situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1528 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D for taking unsecured loans in cash from relatives, as it was deemed not to violate section 269SS. Precedents where penalties were revoked in similar cases involving loans between relatives supported this decision, ensuring a consistent legal interpretation in such situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>