<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1526 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee failed to provide a bona fide explanation for the undisclosed income. The decision confirmed the validity of the penalty proceedings, despite challenges regarding the notice&#039;s specificity and assessment proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty of Rs. 3,80,860/- imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1526 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee failed to provide a bona fide explanation for the undisclosed income. The decision confirmed the validity of the penalty proceedings, despite challenges regarding the notice&#039;s specificity and assessment proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty of Rs. 3,80,860/- imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>