<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1522 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379078</link>
    <description>The appeal against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2014-15 was allowed. The excess claim of gratuity expense was deemed a bona fide mistake by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of the penalty. The court found procedural errors in the notice issued under section 274 and accepted the explanation provided by the assessee, leading to the removal of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1522 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379078</link>
      <description>The appeal against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2014-15 was allowed. The excess claim of gratuity expense was deemed a bona fide mistake by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of the penalty. The court found procedural errors in the notice issued under section 274 and accepted the explanation provided by the assessee, leading to the removal of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>