<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1519 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379075</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on penalties under Section 271AAB. Penalties were confirmed only to the extent supported by evidence found during the search, emphasizing that penalties are not automatic and must be based on corroborative material discovered during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1519 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379075</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on penalties under Section 271AAB. Penalties were confirmed only to the extent supported by evidence found during the search, emphasizing that penalties are not automatic and must be based on corroborative material discovered during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>