<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1518 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379074</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals and assessees&#039; cross objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Penalties not based on corroborative evidence were deleted, while those based on evidence found during the search were confirmed. The tribunal emphasized that penalties under Section 271AAB are not automatic and require specific evidence of undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1518 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379074</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals and assessees&#039; cross objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Penalties not based on corroborative evidence were deleted, while those based on evidence found during the search were confirmed. The tribunal emphasized that penalties under Section 271AAB are not automatic and require specific evidence of undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>